 Robotics Minicourse: Basics of Robotics
Welcome to this Open University robotics minicourse, which
is aimed at anyone who has a general interest in robots and
now wishes to learn more about robotics. We hope you'll find
the course entertaining, informative and worthwhile!

The minicourse concludes with some multiple-choice questions.
Building robots involves the development of a wide range of
skills, including creative thinking, design, mechanics, electronics
and programming - all of which are highly valued in industry.
Your interest in the subject could lead you into an exciting
and fulfilling career at the cutting edge of technology!
You can follow up this minicourse by taking the Open University's
short course T184 Robotics and the meaning of life: a
practical guide to things that think which will further
develop your knowledge and practical skills in robotics. There
is a version of this course offered by some schools. To find
out more about this, see the Open University Young Applicants in Schools Scheme.
What are robots?
Nowadays, the word robot is often applied to any device
that works automatically or by remote control, especially a
machine (automaton) that can be programmed to perform
tasks normally done by people.
Before the 1960s, robot usually meant a manlike mechanical
device (mechanical man or humanoid) capable of
performing human tasks or behaving in a human manner. Today
robots come in all shapes and sizes, including small robots
made of LEGO, and larger wheeled robots that play robot football
with a full-size ball.
What many robots have in common is that they perform tasks
that are too dull, dirty, delicate or dangerous for people.
Usually, we also expect them to be autonomous, that is, to work
using their own sensors and intelligence, without the constant
need for a human to control them. Looked at this way, a radio controlled
aeroplane is not a robot, nor are the radio controlled combat
robots that appear on television. However, there is no clear
dividing line between fully autonomous robots and human-controlled
machines. For example, the robots that perform space missions
on planets like Mars may get instructions from humans on Earth,
but since it can take about ten minutes for messages to get
back and forth, the robot has to be autonomous during that time.
Where did the word robot originate?
The word robot was introduced in 1920 in a play by Karel
Capek called R.U.R. , or Rossum's Universal Robots. Robot comes
from the Czech word robota, meaning forced labour or
drudgery. In the play, human-like mechanical creatures produced
in Rossum's factory are docile slaves. Since they are just machines,
the robots are badly treated by humans. One day a misguided
scientist gives them emotions, and the robots revolt, kill nearly
all humans and take over the world. However, because they are
unable to reproduce themselves, the robots are doomed to die.
However, the sole surviving human creates a male and a female
robot to perpetuate their species.
Have people always been fascinated by human-like machines?
The roots of robotics can be traced back to Greek mythology
and Jewish mysticism. Several myths from Ancient Greece tell
of statues being brought to life. According to Aristotle, the
legendary Greek inventor, Daedalus (whose son Icarus flew too
close to the sun), created animated statues that guarded the
entrance to the Labyrinth in Crete. The Jewish Talmud describes
the making of a golem, a clay model brought to life by
the chanting of magical combinations of letters from the Hebrew
alphabet. A similar idea can be found in medieval alchemy, in
which the philosopher's stone was believed to have a life-giving
force. Mary Shelley drew upon such traditions in her 1818 novel
Frankenstein.
What are the Laws of Robotics?
The term robotics was coined in the 1940s by science
fiction writer Isaac Asimov. In a series of stories and novels,
he imagined a world in which mechanical beings were mankind's
devoted helpmates. They were constrained to obey what have become
known as Asimov's Laws of Robotics:
- A robot may not injure a human being, or, through inaction,
allow a human being to come to harm.
- A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except
where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
- A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection
does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
Asimov’s book of short stories, I, Robot, investigates
the interplay between these laws. In one of the stories, there
is a scandal because a candidate for mayor is suspected of being
a robot – no-one has ever seen him eat, drink, or sleep.
| |
However, the mayor claims he is not a
robot, and the story has many twists and turns before
we find out. Is it possible that we would allow robots
to run our lives? After all, if they obey the First Law
of Robotics, they will never harm us. In this respect
they could be better than human politicians! This will
not be a practical problem for many years, but who knows
what the future holds? |
What was the first practical robot?
A prototype industrial robot arm named Unimate (designed
by George Devol and Joseph Engelberger) was sold to General
Motors in 1959. It plucked hot automobile parts out of a die-casting
machine and quenched them in water.
The 1960s and 1970s saw a revolution in manufacturing
as robots replaced humans for many repetitive jobs. However,
these robots were not intelligent by today’s standards.
Usually they were programmed by humans training their movements,
and they had very little decision-making capabilities. There
are still many robots like this in factories today, but the
trend is towards more intelligent general-purpose robots that
can do more than just paint a panel or screw in a bolt.
Are space probes robots?
Space probes hurtling through the solar system
may not seem like robots, but they fully merit that name by
performing programmed tasks over long periods without direct
human supervision. Operating in the vacuum of space and withstanding
exposure to radiation and extremes of temperature, they explore
places not yet accessible to humans.
| On Christmas Day 2003, the Beagle 2 mission
to Mars attempted to land on the Martian surface. Had the
landing gone smoothly, the robotic shell would have opened
and deployed solar panels to collect electricity, as well
as a ‘PAW’ to collect rock and soil samples
for a small analytic laboratory. The lander also had a ‘mole’
that would have burrowed into the surface to collect samples
for analysis. Beagle 2 is shown on the right with its inventor,
Professor Colin Pillinger of the Open University. |
|
What can't robots do?
It is very difficult to give a robot the ability to perform
a wide variety of tasks, move around in cluttered surroundings,
recognise objects in the ‘real world’, understand normal
speech, and think for itself. These are exciting areas of current
research in robotics and artificial intelligence.
| |
For example, the robot shown here has the
problem of deciding where to cross the river. How can it
make this decision? How would you do it? Perhaps you have
come across a similar situation before. Perhaps you could
look it up in a guide book. Perhaps you would reason that
B is better than C because the water is likely to be shallower?
Perhaps you would choose A, because you tried it before.
All these ways of making decisions come very naturally to
humans, but they are very difficult to program into robots. |
Another great problem in robotics is getting them to understand
language. This is very important in problem-solving. For example,
the four cards below have a letter on one side and a number on
the other. If a card has a vowel (a, e, i, o, u) on one side
then it has an even number on the other. Which cards do you
have to turn over to see if this is true? Think about your answer,
then point to a card to turn it over.
Now consider the following cards where the rule is ‘every
time I go to Paris I go by plane’. Which cards have to
be turned over to test this? Again, think about your answer
before turning the card over.
The answer to the first question is that you have to turn over
the E to see if it has an even number on the back and you have
to turn over the 7 to check that it does not have a vowel on
the back. In an experiment, only 12% of people got this second
part right (did you?).
The answer to the second question is much easier. Of course
you have to turn over the Paris card to check that it has the
word plane on the back, but now it’s much more obvious
that you have to turn over the train card to make sure it does
not have Paris on the back. In the experiment mentioned above,
60% of people got the second part right.
These problems are logically the same, so the experimenters
drew the conclusion that the meaning of the symbols is an important
part of problem solving. Since robots have very poor language
capabilities, their ability to use this kind of reasoning is
very limited.
Another of the great problems in robotics is getting them to
‘see’. Although it is easy to put a camera on a
robot, it is much more difficult to get the robot to understand
what is in an image. Most humans have miraculously good vision.
We are able to resolve great ambiguity in scenes. It has proved
much more difficult to get robots to understand what is in their
universe, and machine vision remains one of the big unsolved
problems in robotics research.

There are other problems in robotics that make progress slow.
For example, your body is covered with skin, and this contains
millions of sensors that allow you to do many fantastically
precise things. For example, try typing at a computer with gloves
on. The lack of touch feedback will make it very difficult.
Also your muscles enable you to have very fine control. Even if you
are rather clumsy, you are probably much better at manipulating objects
than the average robot. Most people would not let a robot dust
their favourite china.
Will robots ever be as good as humans?
Many futurists believe that robots will eventually and inevitably
become more capable than humans, but some experts in artificial
intelligence assert that machines will never be able to develop
the consciousness and emotions needed for reasoning and creativity.
Nonetheless, there are already commercially available robots
that can live in our houses and do basic chores for us. Robots
are very good at processing certain kinds of information, and
they are ideally suited to answering the telephone and being
controlled over the Internet.
The International RoboCup Federation has set itself the challenge
of having a team of humanoid robot football players beat the
human world champions by 2050. Can you image that? It means
that robots will have to become as nimble and skilful as Beckham.
It will require the invention of many new materials –
for example, a human soccer player could be badly hurt if it
clashed with a robot made of metal. It will also require an
enormous improvement in machine vision. If you play sports such
as football, tennis, or even snooker, next time you play think
about the huge amount of information that comes through your
eyes.
What is the future for robots?
Robotic pets, lawn mowers and vacuum cleaners are already on
the market. Following the success of their Aibo robot dog, Sony
have developed a humanoid entertainment robot named QRIO. Honda's
Asimo welcomes customers to their showrooms in Japan. Toshiba have built a robot that can play volleyball. Fujitsu's
HOAP-2 can perform Japanese Sumo wrestling stances, as well
as moves from the Chinese martial art taijiquan.
Rapid advances are being made in robotic control systems, artificial
intelligence, neural networks, and in the miniaturisation, sophistication
and reliability of electronic circuitry, sensors and actuators.
These are all contributing to a steady increase in the capabilities
of robots. Robots currently under development may become widely
used in the food, clothing, nuclear and offshore industries,
healthcare, farming, transportation, mining and defence.
Will robots take over from humans?
This is a popular science fiction theme, and the answer depends
on whether robots will ever attain consciousness and emotions.
In stories like 2001: A Space Odyssey and Terminator,
humans always find a way to outwit intelligent machines that
try to take over control. That's fiction, however, and fact
is often stranger than fiction!
The suggestion that robots will take over because they might
become more intelligent than humans overlooks one critical fact:
the people who have power in human societies are usually not
the most intelligent in the obvious, intellectual way. They have
different kinds of ‘human intelligence’, including
the ability to understand other people, and to influence their
behaviour.
The sensible answer to the question as to whether robots will
take over is that they probably won’t in the near future.
There are many reasons for this. The first is that the robots
of today have puny brains compared to humans, and they do not
have the ability to organise in the same way as humans. Our
societies are very complex and allow us to achieve many very
advanced things. It is unlikely that robots could overtake us
in the near future. Even so, it is something that we should
keep an eye on, since all scientists have a responsibility not
to do things that damage society.
However, for the most part, robots play a very positive role
in our societies, and we can expect them to be used in many
ways that make life better for us all.
If you would like to, why not try out the quiz associated with
this minicourse? Go to quiz now.
Alternatively, if this minicourse has taken your interest,
why not look at the introductory 10 point credit course, T184
- Robotics and the Meaning of Life?
Joy, fun,
robotics @ http://robots.open.ac.uk
|